Considering that the first major lawsuit resolved against cigarette companies more than a decade ago, there has been very much controversy more than whether or not these lawsuits happen to be justified. Around the pro side of the debate there is very much evidence to aid that the tobacco industries possess long regarded about the risks of cigarette smoking. Furthermore that knowledge warrants the need for settlement. In addition the industry has concealed this knowledge in the public. On the con side of the discussion evidence demonstrates these lawsuits have been based upon false statements primarily in regard to health care costs for people who smoke and. Furthermore, the regulations established by the pay out of the 1998 multistate court action have established the best president which allows individuals to avoid their personal responsibilities.
Lawsuits Against Big TobaccoВ… Justified or Not?
Around the pro side, " Legal cases Against Cigarettes Companies Are Justified" by Greenhaven Press can be described as paper quarrelling that law suits against the tobacco industry happen to be justified due to the fact that tobacco firms have knowingly damaged public welfare. On the que tiene side, " Lawsuits Against Tobacco Companies Are Not Justified" also by Greenhaven Press is a newspaper arguing that lawsuits against cigarette companies for the monetary recovery of wellness damages are generally not justified because these legal cases are establishing a legal preceding with the effect of legislation. Even though both papers were edited by the same individual and published by same organization, they are in direct contrast in their perspective.
On the expert side, the paper makes multiple presumptions in regard to the tobacco firms being, for lack of an improved word, nasty. Consequently, the lawsuits happen to be righteous. The paper address the issue of how Big Tobacco knowingly withheld details regarding the health concerns related to smoking. The conventional paper states, " Industry paperwork show the fact that companies were aware of the link between smoking and lung cancer prior to the initially surgeon-general statement on the subject in 1964, although they refused such a link for years. " The paper goes on to consider nicotine in cigarettes, and just how Big Tobacco knew pure nicotine was addicting. The conventional paper shows what size Tobacco increased nicotine levels to ensure smokers would continue smoking. The paper declares, " Sector documentsВ…show, over and above a doubt, that as early as the 1960s cigarettes companies understood that the nicotine in cigarettes was a great addictive medication, even though that they denied this kind of fact until well into the 1990s" The paper goes on to state, " evidence [shows] that the tobacco companies unnaturally raised cigarette smoking concentrations in cigarettes. " This paper has shown the statements above to be reality by directly quoting materials found in files produced by five major cigarette companies. In light of these specifics, my opinion is the fact there should be some type of compensation to prospects smokers whom began smoking cigarettes before the surgeon-general's warning was labeled on cigarettes.
On the other hand, the que contiene side makes multiple presumptions in regard to the lawsuits becoming the legal precedent and that these legal cases are wear false disputes. Consequently, the results of the lawsuits are corrupt. This paper details the issue of medical costs in fact being larger for nonsmokers when taking into account the costs more than an entire life time. The paper states, " Smokers' untimely deaths mean that the government consumes less money upon smokers' old age payments and nursing home care. " While this may be a callous statement, the truth is hardly disputable and is maintained a 97 study in the New Britain Journal of Medicine. In addition , the paper address how the federal government, both federal and state, has already produced billions of dollars from fees on cigarettes. This money more than makes up for the costs which the states sued for which makes the lawsuits unwarrantable. This conventional paper states, " The government excise tax on smokes was 34 cents per pack, and that is scheduled to enhance to 39...
References: Regarding Greenhaven. Recovered October 13, 2005 by http://galegroup.com/greenhave/about.htm
" Lawsuits Against Tobacco Companies Are Justified. " Smoking. James D. Torr, Ed. Rival Viewpoints DigestsВ® Series. Greenhaven Press, 2001. Opposing Opinions Resource Centre. Thomson Gale. 12 August 2005 http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/OVRC
" Legal cases Against Cigarettes Companies Are Certainly not Justified. " Smoking. James D. Torr, Ed. Opposition Viewpoints DigestsВ® Series. Greenhaven Press, 2001. Opposing Views Resource Middle. Thomson Gale. 12 Oct 2005 http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/OVRC